Search found 14 matches
- Mon Jul 26, 2021 2:21 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
So I haven't managed to decode it using the rules, but I have been able to make out the code using python, it is basically a KOMECO112_128AC with a header of: 3428,-1636, and a trailer of: 456,-456,6 I think that is why it's having trouble decoding it as that extra 0 at the end given by the trailer'...
- Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:20 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
Your little device is amazing! With clean codes read using it, the Xiaomi remote works like a charm even without specifying length. It's going to be a cool summer! Thank you! EDIT: Seems that now that I get clean codes it cannot find any rule to apply to get the bits. Can I make my own custom rules?
- Sat Jun 26, 2021 9:10 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
So I found out what the problem is with the distance when using my phone with the AC. The infrared sensor (REM) on the AC, seen in the next picture, AC_small_1.jpg has a glass cover, the only problem is that when it is closed, it covers the sensor. Like so: AC_small_2.jpg With the cover up, I get mo...
- Sun Jun 13, 2021 8:25 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
I know, I am hacking away at the xiaomi in the mean time. Need to get hold of the firmware. It looks like in order to send AC codes with the xiaomi you need to send a length with the base64 encoded string, but I am not sure how that length is calculated as it does not work with just the length of th...
- Sun Jun 13, 2021 10:48 am
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
Tried buying it, but paypal is just stuck at adding card.
EDIT: After some wrangling with paypal the order is in: Order #5893
EDIT: After some wrangling with paypal the order is in: Order #5893
- Wed Jun 09, 2021 7:08 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
This is what the Xiaomi read from the AC remote: 3430,1620,480,1260,460,1290,460,450,480,420,450,450,480,1260,480,420,480,430,480,1260,480,1260,480,420,460,1290,480,420,480,420,480,1270,480,1270,480,420,480,1260,480,1260,480,420,480,420,480,1260,480,420,460,450,480,1260,480,420,480,420,480,420,480,4...
- Wed Jun 09, 2021 3:39 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
You are right, I cannot get the TV to work with the Xiaomi either so there may be something wrong with my b64 encoding. From what I found online the Xiaomi expects a base64 encoded string that is just the raw codes as bytes compressed with heatshrink library. I need to tinker some more with this. We...
- Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:34 am
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
I am getting this weird behaviour where both the raw signal and the cleaned one work if I am 0.5 meters from the AC (but not further) while using them on my phone (HTC One M9 with ir blaster, irplus app) and not at all with the Xiaomi no matter the distance. Could this be because of the frequency?
- Tue Jun 08, 2021 3:03 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
Yes, I reverse engineered the signals using LSB8 and forgot about it and I just couldn't understand why things didn't line up. Now all I have to do is understand how to encode the raw signal in base64 in order for my Xiaomi remote to be able to use them.
- Tue Jun 08, 2021 2:10 pm
- Forum: IR Protocols & Codes
- Topic: TechnoLux AC codes
- Replies: 22
- Views: 24295
Re: TechnoLux AC codes
Hmm, I think my excel does not account for bit ordering...
EDIT: Yes, now it all makes sense, the bits are reversed.
So that means that when I build my signal I have to reverse every byte before turning it into a raw signal?
Thank you so much for all the help!
EDIT: Yes, now it all makes sense, the bits are reversed.
So that means that when I build my signal I have to reverse every byte before turning it into a raw signal?
Thank you so much for all the help!